Requesters
often ask us for recommendations on how to best attract and engage Workers in
Mechanical Turk’s marketplace. We’ve shared
recommendations for building
Requester reputation in previous posts. Today, we wanted to revisit the topic, this
time sharing insights directly from Workers on what makes a Requester great.
In order to
collect insights from Workers, we posted a HIT to Mechanical Turk asking
Workers to share their perspective on actions Requesters can take to make their
HITs more attractive. Based on previous
surveys we’ve conducted, we know that a primary motivation for Workers is
monetary reward. However, in this exercise, we wanted to explore other
approaches that Requesters can use to build their relationship with Workers
outside of compensation.
So, what
did Workers have to say? In reviewing their feedback, three key themes emerged:
Communicating with Workers by addressing questions and
providing feedback can help identify issues in HIT design and improve the
quality of results.
“Communication! A great requester
communicates regularly with their workforce. That means answering emails
promptly or connecting with us in the forum to address questions and concerns,
announce changes and upcoming work, explain work and rejections policies in
more detail, etc. Communication makes everything easier, for everybody
involved. Nothing worse than being rejected or even blocked and never [knowing]
why.”
“The great requestor gives feedback
for good work and bad. If there is a way that a worker can improve their work,
constructive feedback is the only way to know how to do so. Good feedback
inspires more good work.”
“Requesters who take the time to
communicate are at the top of my list.
Communication allows the workers to have a better idea of what the
requester is looking for and in turn provides the requester with better work. It doesn't take much just an email or two and
has an enormous return on investment.”
"An open line of communication
between Worker and Requester can improve any issue on either side. Being open
and responsive to feedback is a great sign that a requester is interested in
improving the quality of work and the quality of worker/requester experience on
MTurk in general.”
“Having an active presence on [a
Mechanical Turk Forum, like TurkerNation] affords a Requester the
opportunity to be a great Requester. The ability to communicate with a group of
Workers, as well as recruit new Workers, is a time saving, cost-effective way
to advertise tasks, clarify or modify instructions and/or qualify Workers. A
Requester that is willing to do these things is not only a great Requester, but
a great Requester [who] will obtain quality results on the tasks they publish
because the Workers will be waiting for their HITs to launch.”
Approving (or Rejecting) assignments in a timely manner helps Requesters build trust with Workers.
“Pay promptly. If you have a lot of
HITs and you are a new Requester to me, I will be reluctant to do a large batch
of hits before I know that I will get paid. If I start doing a batch of HITs
for you, and within a few hours I see "payment pending" (meaning that you’ve approved my
work) for the first 100 or more HITs, I will have no reservations in spending
the entire day and the next day working on your HITs.”
“I prefer hits that [are approved]
quickly. It helps me to judge my work. If there is a problem I can fix it if
need be. Plus getting the money quickly helps. Some HITs take days to get approved. By then I have moved on to other hits so if there is a problem it is
hard to fix."
Mistakes
happen, but quickly reversing mistakenly rejected assignments can encourage Worker
loyalty.
“Great Requesters know when to admit
that they have screwed up. I've had many times where I felt that my work was
unjustly rejected after I had spent a good amount of time on it. When I contact
great Requesters about this type of issue they find a way to make it right,
either by offering me a bonus for the rejected work or additional work that
will earn back my trust and respect for them.”
“Learning how [Mechanical Turk]
works, specifically reversing rejections.
Rejections stay with a Worker forever even when the requester is at fault. When
a Requester learns how the UI works and realizes they can reverse rejections,
I'm more likely to stick with them on future tasks.”
“Quick and honest dispute
resolution. On several occasions I have
had work incorrectly rejected. When I
have reached out to the Requester, they have responded quickly by double
checking the error in question and either admitting the mistake on their part
or acknowledging that the reject was in error.
They either reverse the rejection or they [issue a] bonus...”
To learn more about best practices for achieving results on Mechanical
Turk and building your reputation with Workers, be sure to review the Requester Best Practices Guide.
Finally, thank you to all of the Workers who contributed feedback. We appreciate your insight.
-- Andrea